Two barristers (fancy lawyers) split up after living together and briefly being engaged to each other. It's turned into a he said, she said story and of course she's believed, he isn't.
Barrister Kerry Cox today won her legal battle against a fellow barrister she said made promises over property valued at more than £1 million when they were engaged.
Miss Cox launched the High Court claim against Lawrence Jones who she claimed was her fiance until she was forced to break off the engagement because of his drunken violence.
She wanted full ownership of a flat in Islington valued at £200,000 and a half share of a mill in Essex worth £800,000.
Mr Justice Mann, who gave his ruling today, awarded her full ownership of the flat and a quarter share of the mill after dismissing Mr Jones as devious and less credible as a witness than Miss Cox.
Mr Jones said after the hearing: “I am surprised. I think this is a sad day for the decent and generous and a good day for the duplicitous, deceptive and dishonest
James Stewart, head of family law at the company, said: “There is no concept of common law marriage in England and Wales, and when a co-habiting relationship ends, the often vulnerable (non-owning) co-habitant has nothing like the matrimonial legislation for protection.”
Of Miss Cox the judge said: “While she was quite clearly very ambitious for the good things in life to an extent that some would find unattractive, I do not think that that has driven her to lie, though it has led to some wishful thinking in this case in relation to her claim to an interest in the mill.”
She very ambitious and greedy but of course she wouldn't lie. He's probably an alcoholic. He may well be violent but it's not clear that we have any evidence other than her claims about that. What seems kind of funny in the 21st century, the 3rd millennium, is that any promises he has made, promises which obviously were verbal, might be when drunk, might be in bed, these promises are as binding as the most strict legal contract. One might think that if we're all friends now and there is no such thing as commitment, well not really any such thing, then if someone moves in it would be like a flatmate moving in. Agreements are made about electricity and food bills, and if they want to sleep with the flat owner then that's their choice; but if they split up they don't end up owning the flat. If on the other hand there is such a thing as commitment and promises of a future life together are binding, then call me back when a man gets a flat from a woman after living with her on the basis of his testimony of what she promised him.
Full story at the Scotsman Judge Rules Against 'Devious' Barrister
Recent Comments